Injury - IPC Section 44

Injury - IPC Section 44

This is the digital era, everything is easily available on the Internet. Clothes, groceries, electronic equipment, etc. Social Media and online shopping have been very convenient during the lockdown period. Due to the increase in usage of social media, there has been a rapid increase in cybercrime cases, most prominent are defamation, injury, fraud, extortion, etc. From a layman’s view, these crimes are ordinary but these are serious cases that are increasing day by day and causing a huge problem for cybercrime branches. For example, for a common man “injury” can only be done in physical form or can only be caused due to a physical fight, whereas in the eyes of law, as stated in Section 44 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860 “injury” can be executed by causing illegal damage to a person’s mind, body, reputation or property.

What is Section 44?

Article 44 of the Indian code denotes “injury” as any harm ille­gally caused to a person, in body, mind, reputation, or proper­ty.

In simple words, this article states that if A has endured any kind of injury to her body, mind, reputation, or property illegally due to B, then B will be liable for causing injury to A under article 44 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 and will be asked to compensate A for the damages caused.


Consult the best lawyer online


Is Section 44 bailable?

Bail simply means the discharge of an accused person awaiting trial on a short-lived basis, sometimes on condition that a sum of cash is registered to form sure their appearance in Court. Till now, there hasn’t been any clear-cut proclamation in the Indian Penal Code regarding this matter. Bail may be granted if the damage is substantial or may not be granted if the damages have a ruinous effect, based on the matter and the decree passed by the Court.

What is the punishment for the Section 44 Case?

Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, wrongfully confining a person for three days or more, assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage per modesty, dishonest misappropriation of property are a few cases of injury.

This offence has no punishment in essence but with strong evidence against the accused, the Court can pass a rigorous decree.

Is Section 44 a cognizable offence or a non-cognizable offence ?

A cognizable offence is defined as an offence where a police officer can arrest a person without a warrant. After the arrest has been made, the accused will be presented before the Magistrate within 24 hours. In this case, it is a non - cognizable offence. Even if the damage caused by the accused is done voluntarily, police cannot arrest him/her without a warrant as this will go in opposition of a citizen’s fundamental right enumerated in the Constitution of India, 1949.

How to file/defend your case for Section 44 offence?

Defending one’s case in this matter can be trouble-free with rigid evidence in one’s favor. For example, A has a property alongside a rose garden, B has voluntarily damaged A’s garden by uprooting the flowers and scattering sand around the garden. A has filed a complaint against B for injury. Here, B will be liable as he has voluntarily caused damage to A’s property. In this case, if B has enough evidence to prove his innocence then, the Court might spare him.

If the prosecution has strong and vital evidence through which it can be observed that this executor deliberately caused damage and has a malicious intention. The accused can be punished as the Court fits it mandatory.

Is Section 44 a bailable or non-bailable offence?

As stated above, there are no rigid laws in this matter, the accused can be set free before the trial on bail if the Courts deem fit.

Some Judgment w.r.t. Section 44:

Dr.R.Muthukumaran vs Ramesh Babu on 3 March 2017: A learned Counsel for the second respondent / de-facto complaint would submit that in the case on hand the accused are public servants. The attendance register was in the custody of A-1, he was given the power to send a certificate of attendance to the Medical University. He had manipulated the register in an incorrect manner and caused injury to the defacto-complainant. Hence, prima facie cases under Section 167 IPC are also made out. Admittedly the defacto-complainant has been selected from the service quota. It is also admitted that if a candidate from the service quota has not attended the classes, the salary wouldn't tend. Here, admittedly, the defacto-complainant has been paid full salary. The possible legal inference would be that the defacto-complainant attended the category and got full attendance. Only because of the wrong entry made by both the accused, he was not permitted to write the examination. Hence, it's an injury on his mind and his reputation has been spoiled. The injury is mentioned in Section 44 IPC.  Section 44 IPC - the word 'injury' denotes any harm whatever illegally caused termed for the attempt to commit forgery. Hence, the accused have to face the trial. Eventually, he prayed that the quashing applications are susceptible to be dismissed. Admittedly, the defacto-complainant has been selected from the service quota. It is the case of the defacto-complainant that if a candidate from the service quota has not attended the classes, the salary wouldn't tend. In the case available, the defacto-complainant has been paid full salary. Hence, according to the defacto-complainant, the possible legal inference would be that the defacto-complainant attended the classes and got full attendance. Only because of the wrong entry said to have been made by both the accused, the defacto-complainant was not permitted to write the examination. Hence, it's an injury on his mind and his reputation has been spoiled. Injury is defined in Section 44 IPC. Section 44 IPC - the word 'injury' denotes any harm whatever illegally caused to a person, in body, mind, reputation, or property. But according to the petitioners/accused the attendance register was not in their custody nor are they the custodians of the documents and therefore, the charge of the preparation of the said documents will not arise. Consequently, causing injury in the mind of the defacto-complainant by making any wrong entry does not arise in this case.


Get in touch with the best lawyer online


Conclusion: With the increasing crime rate in the city, it is very important to keep in mind that if anyone has suffered losses due to someone else’s malicious intention and deliberate measures, then that person is bound to pay compensation if proven guilty. Our judicial system and its working process is always fair-minded and impartial in its decision-making process, and our legal understanding, such crimes will soon come to an end.

This remarkable article was drafted by Ms. Nishi Ved, Fourth-year B.L.S.L.L.B. student, M.K.E.S. College of Law, Mumbai.
Offence Punishment Cognizance Bail Triable By
Injury as per the court decree non-cognizable Bailable Any Magistrate
Offence Injury
Punishment as per the court decree
Cognizance non-cognizable
Bail Bailable
Triable By Any Magistrate

BOOK A SERVICE




Consult a Lawyer Now